

Marc Stevens knows what it costs to get an early-stage hire wrong.
He's been in and around startups long enough to understand the math: limited runway, limited time, and a team that can't afford six months of recovery if the wrong person walks in the door. When Row64 closed its $4M seed round and it was time to build out go-to-market, Marc wasn't nervous about hiring. He was clear-eyed about the stakes.
"You don't get too many chances to get it right," he said. "You need someone senior enough to run without a lot of supervision. But not so senior that they're asking, where's my team?"
That's the tension most technical founders face when it's time to hire GTM leadership. It's not that they don't know what they want. It's that the person who checks every box is rare, and the pressure to just fill the seat is real. Marc knew that going in, and he didn't want to learn it the hard way.
Row64 is a real-time operational intelligence platform built for what legacy BI tools can't handle: massive, fast-moving datasets at sub-millisecond speed. GPU-accelerated dashboards. Billions of records. A standard browser. The category they're building didn't exist before they built it.
After raising a $4M seed round led by Galaxy Interactive, with participation from Alumni Ventures and Differential Ventures, Marc knew the next move had to be right. Two hires would define whether Row64 could build a real go-to-market motion or spend the next year recovering from a mistake.
Row64 needed someone technical enough to go deep with engineers, customer-facing enough to run a compelling demo, and ready to take over what the founders had been doing themselves. At sub-$1M in revenue, there was no playbook, no established sales motion, no team behind them. Just a product that needed to be in front of customers and a lot of work to do before that could scale.
Finding someone with the technical depth and the customer-facing polish and the stomach for that kind of early-stage ambiguity — that was the hard part.
"You have to look at the whole package," Marc said. "You're not going to hit 10 on 10 on every criteria."
Mikhail Pikalov was submitted within days of the search launching. Six weeks later, he'd signed. He's been in seat nine months, and the impact shows up as pace more than any single moment.
"It's having someone you trust to hand things off to," Marc said, "knowing they're going to be done right. You trust them talking to customers. Things are going to get done the way you would do them yourself."
For a founding team that has been heads-down building for years, that kind of trust is hard to put a number on.
Marc came into the Head of Sales search thinking he needed a Founding AE. It's the most common instinct at this stage: get someone who can close, build repeatable pipeline, and figure it out from there.
But early-stage hiring rarely goes exactly as scoped, and that's not a failure. That's the process working.
After time in market and conversations with dozens of candidates, the GTM team started seeing a pattern in the feedback. The profiles kept falling short in the same way. Strong closers, but not thought partners. People who could plug in and sell, but not build the playbook from scratch or think alongside a founder in real time. The data was telling a story: the role wasn't scoped quite right.
That's when Captivate brought in the executive search team and sat down with Marc to recalibrate. Together, they worked through what the role actually needed to be: a Founding Head of Sales rather than a Founding AE. Someone with first-in-function experience who could still carry a bag while building the infrastructure underneath them. It's a meaningful distinction, and one that's easy to miss until you've talked to enough candidates to see it clearly.
The market map across both personas totaled roughly 157 people, giving Marc the full picture of what was available and the confidence to make a strong decision when the right person appeared.
"They pivoted," Marc said. "And then the profiles that were coming through were much more aligned to what we needed at this stage."
That person was Kosmond Russell, now Head of Sales. Marc said the exercise was necessary and he'd do it the same way again.
"The cost of hiring the wrong person is huge," he said. "It's not just what you're paying them. You're spending your time trying to get them to be what you were hoping. And if it doesn't work out, you almost lose a year. At this stage, that's life or death."
Part of Row64's process was intentional pressure.
Every finalist got the honest version of the role: the uncertainty, the early-stage chaos, the reality that nothing was figured out yet. Marc calls it trying to scare them away.
"I'd rather scare them away now," he said. "This is going to be hard. We haven't figured out the exact formula. Are you going to be able to have the stomach to get through that?"
Kos had done his homework. He understood where he was in his career and why this was the right move. The transparency didn't scare him off — it landed.
"You could tell he had done his homework on where he was in his career and what he wanted and why this was a good fit for him," Marc said.
Five months in, the early signals are exactly what you want to see.
"You know those things pretty early," Marc said. "They want more. They're asking what they can take from you. They're being proactive. Their ability to challenge the status quo, to be transparent and straightforward... that came across very early."
Row64 came to Captivate through a referral from their advisor Jeremy Kirsch, who had seen the firm's work firsthand at other early-stage companies. When the first search went well, there was no reason to look elsewhere for the second.
"If something's working, we don't change it," Marc said. "The initial success was there, the chemistry was good, and we knew the types of profiles Captivate is good at finding."
"Assuming it's going to go easy and fast is probably not a good idea."
If the search takes one month but you hire the wrong person, and three months later they're gone, you've lost far more than the extra time would have cost you. Marc's seen enough hiring decisions go sideways to know that speed is a false economy at this stage.
His other piece of advice: know your stack rank before you start.
"If you have 10 criteria and everything has to be 10 on 10, you can draw yourself a chart. The more perfect the hire has to be, the longer it's going to take. So where are you willing to compromise? What's the place that's going to hurt the least?"
Getting to that answer early, before the search starts, is the conversation that saves founders the most time in the end.
Roles Placed:Â Captivate Talent placed Mikhail Pikalov as Director of Solutions Engineering and Kosmond Russell as Head of Sales.
Captivate Team: Tyler Mattos and Katie Ostrander


Row64 is a real-time operational intelligence platform built for what legacy BI tools can't handle

Marc Stevens knows what it costs to get an early-stage hire wrong.
He's been in and around startups long enough to understand the math: limited runway, limited time, and a team that can't afford six months of recovery if the wrong person walks in the door. When Row64 closed its $4M seed round and it was time to build out go-to-market, Marc wasn't nervous about hiring. He was clear-eyed about the stakes.
"You don't get too many chances to get it right," he said. "You need someone senior enough to run without a lot of supervision. But not so senior that they're asking, where's my team?"
That's the tension most technical founders face when it's time to hire GTM leadership. It's not that they don't know what they want. It's that the person who checks every box is rare, and the pressure to just fill the seat is real. Marc knew that going in, and he didn't want to learn it the hard way.
Row64 is a real-time operational intelligence platform built for what legacy BI tools can't handle: massive, fast-moving datasets at sub-millisecond speed. GPU-accelerated dashboards. Billions of records. A standard browser. The category they're building didn't exist before they built it.
After raising a $4M seed round led by Galaxy Interactive, with participation from Alumni Ventures and Differential Ventures, Marc knew the next move had to be right. Two hires would define whether Row64 could build a real go-to-market motion or spend the next year recovering from a mistake.
Row64 needed someone technical enough to go deep with engineers, customer-facing enough to run a compelling demo, and ready to take over what the founders had been doing themselves. At sub-$1M in revenue, there was no playbook, no established sales motion, no team behind them. Just a product that needed to be in front of customers and a lot of work to do before that could scale.
Finding someone with the technical depth and the customer-facing polish and the stomach for that kind of early-stage ambiguity — that was the hard part.
"You have to look at the whole package," Marc said. "You're not going to hit 10 on 10 on every criteria."
Mikhail Pikalov was submitted within days of the search launching. Six weeks later, he'd signed. He's been in seat nine months, and the impact shows up as pace more than any single moment.
"It's having someone you trust to hand things off to," Marc said, "knowing they're going to be done right. You trust them talking to customers. Things are going to get done the way you would do them yourself."
For a founding team that has been heads-down building for years, that kind of trust is hard to put a number on.
Marc came into the Head of Sales search thinking he needed a Founding AE. It's the most common instinct at this stage: get someone who can close, build repeatable pipeline, and figure it out from there.
But early-stage hiring rarely goes exactly as scoped, and that's not a failure. That's the process working.
After time in market and conversations with dozens of candidates, the GTM team started seeing a pattern in the feedback. The profiles kept falling short in the same way. Strong closers, but not thought partners. People who could plug in and sell, but not build the playbook from scratch or think alongside a founder in real time. The data was telling a story: the role wasn't scoped quite right.
That's when Captivate brought in the executive search team and sat down with Marc to recalibrate. Together, they worked through what the role actually needed to be: a Founding Head of Sales rather than a Founding AE. Someone with first-in-function experience who could still carry a bag while building the infrastructure underneath them. It's a meaningful distinction, and one that's easy to miss until you've talked to enough candidates to see it clearly.
The market map across both personas totaled roughly 157 people, giving Marc the full picture of what was available and the confidence to make a strong decision when the right person appeared.
"They pivoted," Marc said. "And then the profiles that were coming through were much more aligned to what we needed at this stage."
That person was Kosmond Russell, now Head of Sales. Marc said the exercise was necessary and he'd do it the same way again.
"The cost of hiring the wrong person is huge," he said. "It's not just what you're paying them. You're spending your time trying to get them to be what you were hoping. And if it doesn't work out, you almost lose a year. At this stage, that's life or death."
Part of Row64's process was intentional pressure.
Every finalist got the honest version of the role: the uncertainty, the early-stage chaos, the reality that nothing was figured out yet. Marc calls it trying to scare them away.
"I'd rather scare them away now," he said. "This is going to be hard. We haven't figured out the exact formula. Are you going to be able to have the stomach to get through that?"
Kos had done his homework. He understood where he was in his career and why this was the right move. The transparency didn't scare him off — it landed.
"You could tell he had done his homework on where he was in his career and what he wanted and why this was a good fit for him," Marc said.
Five months in, the early signals are exactly what you want to see.
"You know those things pretty early," Marc said. "They want more. They're asking what they can take from you. They're being proactive. Their ability to challenge the status quo, to be transparent and straightforward... that came across very early."
Row64 came to Captivate through a referral from their advisor Jeremy Kirsch, who had seen the firm's work firsthand at other early-stage companies. When the first search went well, there was no reason to look elsewhere for the second.
"If something's working, we don't change it," Marc said. "The initial success was there, the chemistry was good, and we knew the types of profiles Captivate is good at finding."
"Assuming it's going to go easy and fast is probably not a good idea."
If the search takes one month but you hire the wrong person, and three months later they're gone, you've lost far more than the extra time would have cost you. Marc's seen enough hiring decisions go sideways to know that speed is a false economy at this stage.
His other piece of advice: know your stack rank before you start.
"If you have 10 criteria and everything has to be 10 on 10, you can draw yourself a chart. The more perfect the hire has to be, the longer it's going to take. So where are you willing to compromise? What's the place that's going to hurt the least?"
Getting to that answer early, before the search starts, is the conversation that saves founders the most time in the end.
Roles Placed:Â Captivate Talent placed Mikhail Pikalov as Director of Solutions Engineering and Kosmond Russell as Head of Sales.
Captivate Team: Tyler Mattos and Katie Ostrander